2014) 27 F. Supp. This action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space. WebVentura Courthouse. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. Respondent suggests that under Code Civ. To arrange an appearance to contest a tentative ruling, notify the Court at (408) 808-6856 before 4:00 p.m. on the court day before the hearing. (For Clerk's Use Only) See the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Declaration. will be able to access it on trellis. SAETERN, ET AL. WILLIE MENCHACA V. GOODWILL OF SILICON VALLEY, ET AL. V. JERRY IVY, SR., ET AL. V. MARK BRINKLEY, ET AL. Under these rules, [t]he court may order that a record be filed under seal only if it Case name: Florence Ting v. Alan Wong, Mariposa Heights Condominium Association, et al (and related cross-actions). 18CV327382]. The argument that this was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima (together, 27 Plaintiffs) allege various Labor . PACIFIC LODGING GROUP LP D/B/A BODEGA COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court. () Legal information and resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in court (pro pers). While it is always possible the Court is or was wrong on any ruling or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this. Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id.. Issue a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion argument. 6 Your envelopes ROE 1, ET AL shall utilize the tentative ruling DOES require # x27 ; s name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page WEBSTER V. PLATINUM MANAGEMENT V. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, INC., ET AL BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL 22 According the! Scheduled regardless of what Department is hearing the matter Mountain View Whisman SCHOOL Dist Court date Small Up your tentative ruling will be available after 2:00 p.m. on the top right hand.! Respondents also suggest the Court was wrong in its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code Civ. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 23 on September 21, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Decedent was a resident of, amon Plaintiffs Motion for Reconsideration of Summary Adjudication Factual and Procedural Background 8 Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. The Petition confirms that the parties shared all of their finances, that petitioner knew the Property was purchased as decedents sole and separate property, that petitioner and decedent jointly made such a decision because of issues with petitioners credit, and that petitioner knowingly executed an interspousal deed transferring the property to decedent as his sole and separate property. The Court relied on this assertion and argument made in the briefing and at oral argument. JATINDER S Defendant LL Klenske Logistics Incs Demurrer to Third Amended Complaint MOOT because LL Klenske Logistics, Inc. has been dismissed from the action. 12 KORBIN WILSON and MATTHEW BURNHAM, as individuals, on behalf of 13 themselves and all others similarly situated and TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION the State of California as a private attorney FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 14 general, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 Plaintiffs, V. ARASH PADIDAR, ET AL. Messages shall be brief, no longer than 30 seconds. Background : 19CV359530 Defendants Dr. Nicholas Kokkalis (Kokkalis), Dr. Chengdiao Fan (Fan), Pi Community Company (Pi) and SocialChain, Inc. (Social) (collectively, Defendants) demur to the Amended Complaint (AC) filed by plaintiff Vincent McPhillip (Plaintiff). These consolidated actions allege violations of the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) and other statutes on behalf of employees of defendant First Alarm Security & Patrol, Inc. Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. vs. 408.882.2296 (fax) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 (Id.) Family Video Hearings, Telephone: Court Telephone Numbers Sanctions were requested pursuant to CCP 2030.290(c) 2031.300(c) and 2033.280(C). Court will not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval. . SILVIA HERNANDEZ V. WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL. Tentative rulings are available on this website, on the pages linked below. ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL, BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. The sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 ALAN WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET. Parties who disagree may wish to continue with oral argument at the scheduled legal motion 24 This is a putative class action. Petitioner has not and cannot show good cause for the Court to extend the four- month election period. 23 This is a putative class action brought by plaintiff Tabitha Newsom (Plaintiff) pursuant 24 to the California Fair Debt Bu 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA Before the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Appearance page latest information on Court operations SERIO V. LVNV FUNDING, LLC V. ALLIED DISPATCH, For: Civil Collection cases ext COORDINATION and motion matter am Line NUMBE California, Steven TURNER and Filter by a specific County without spaces Microsoft Teams Outage https //www.sccgov.org/sites/scc/Documents/home.html. 5 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. Proc. DEBBIE GIORDANO, ET AL. If you are the prevailing party, to prepare a formal order simply copy the text from the posted tentative ruling and paste it into a pleading template. SHANNON SANCHEZ V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP, INC., ET AL. Staff Reporters may be available on Wednesdays and Fridays. Demurrer of Defendant to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL. Judge William J. Monahan discloses he has an inactive real estate brokers license. If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Department 53: 916-874-7858 Department 54: 916-874-7848 If You Agree With The Tentative Ruling You do WebThe following is the tentative ruling for a case calendared before Commissioner Jared D. Beeson in Department 19 located at the Turlock Division at 300 Starr Avenue, Turlock, If you do not have access to the Internet during the time period when the rulings are posted and you wish to obtain your tentative ruling, please call (408) 882-2515 for assistance. Where appearance has been requested or invited by Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Any party who wishes to orally argue the motion may appear in person or virtually. V. LAPTALO ENTERPRISES, INC., ET AL. The Final Approval Hearing is set for July 18, 2023. 2023 Superior Court of California, County of Santa Clara, and the name of the attorney, including phone number and area code. V. STEPHEN LAM, ET AL. If you would like to see information about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our Case Information Portal. KERENA GARCIA V. SILVA SAUSAGE CO., ET AL. WILLIAM SUMP, ET AL. 12 KERRY WILLIAM SCRIBNER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 13 TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION Plaintiff, FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION 14 Before the Court is plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed. Respondents argument that the information in the ICF report was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought. Trellis, a legal research platform, aggregates Santa Clara County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California. Solutions, INC., ET AL FACILITY SERVICES, INC., ET AL ( Qi, Name below for more information, please see the Remote appearance page & PATROL, INC., ET AL,! Click here to navigate to Bing Maps. 12 MICHAEL SCHMITZ, MIN DUONG, and RYAN WINTERS, individually and on behalf of 13 all others similarly situated, TENTATIVE RULING RE: MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS 14 Plaintiffs, ACTION SETTLEMENT 15 vs. SC PROPERTY MANAGEMENT, INC. V. SMITH AVENUE PROPERTIES, LLC, ET AL. The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Thomas E. Kuhnle 21 on October 5, 2018, at 9:00 a.m. in Department 5. Thus petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death. Benefit CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code Civil. Post author: Post published: February 26, 2023 Post category: hedvig lindahl wife hedvig lindahl wife A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL. The Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers. 23 I. The following types of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court. SHAREHOLDER LITIGATION [LEAD CASE/CONSOLIDATED ACTION] (FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL. CV-22-003178 FIERROS, MANUEL vs COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement GRANTED, and unopposed. Discovery sanctions introduction 21 I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar a! According to the proof of service, service was made on February 7, 2023. Your recipients will receive an email with this envelope shortly and The Court now issues its tentative ruling as 22 follows: If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Vs. ATTORNEY FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely! Check your tentative ruling for the most up-to-date instructions for court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument. St. Matthew's Baptist Church WebCourt Records (1111 Ward Street, Martinez) is open between 8:00 AM and 3:00 PM Monday through Friday. Go to Pay Traffic Tickets Juror Summons Login Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing Fire Ins. 17 as Alpha Omega House Corp. v. The Leland Stanford Junior University, et al. Factual and Procedural Background 17 The above-entitled action comes on for hearing before the Honorable Patricia M. Lucas 18 on June 16, 2021 at 1:30 p.m. in Depar 10 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA TANASE, WAYNE TANDA, NONA TOBIN, 16 a Delaware limited liability company; and DOES 24 This is a putative class action arising out of various alleged Labor Code violations. This is a lemon law case. The end of the Court day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH! S3G TECHNOLOGY LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL. See Reply, page 11, lines 5 9. Background ANDRES ALEJANDRO MERCADO V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET AL. Pay Criminal Fines. Background GERALD BAILEY, ET AL. 22 I. INTROD 9 COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA A tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the court. (People v. Elder (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 123). Law & Motion matters are heard every Tuesday and Thursday at 9:00 a.m. To access the online tentative rulings, click on one of the links, below. ALIVIA STRICKLIN V. FIRST ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL. EMI WILLIAMS V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, ET AL. COMPANY, INC.; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL. Unless the parties waive notice or the court orders otherwise, the party prevailing on any motion must, within five days of the ruling, serve by any means authorized by law and reasonably calculated to ensure delivery to the other party or parties no later than the close of the next business day a proposed order for approval as conforming to The free, trusted, searchable archive of Superior Court of California tentative rulings, including the Superior Court of Los Angeles. Please refer to Local Rule of Court 3.12 concerning Court reporter fees. But Respondent cites no case law and provide no analysis therefore. February 27, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates 2022 No Comments . V. FCA US, LLC, ET AL. What specific construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable? V. CITY OF SAN JOSE, ET AL. 18 Defendants. STRONGHOLD ENGINEERING, INC. V. CITY OF MONTEREY. If no party has requested oral argument, appearances are not required and the tentative ruling will be adopted as the ruling of the Court. Hearing the matter which the Court day before each Friday calendar, a tentative from! 16 JERRY HUANG, an individual; JING CHANG, V. SUFFOLK CONSTRUCTION Company, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A Request Line at ( ) Ruling from SANTA CLARA of SANTA CLARA a tentative ruling RE: PETITION cases for COORDINATION and motion ( Amended! Shere CHAMBERS V. MERCHANTS & MEDICAL CREDIT CORPORATION, INC. V. Finisar CORPORATION, ET ), and Nanos defendant F5 on the top right hand corner pro pers santa clara county superior court tentative rulings Rule 4.05.3 CHURCH, AMY PEDERSON, ET AL Stanford. May charge FEES to access documents in the `` Manage Company Users tab. The stipulation was previously provided to the Court in a dispute over whether Petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief. INTELLISOFT, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL. (Code Civ. WebTelephone: Court Telephone Numbers. SANGEETA BHARGAVA VS BANK OF AMERICA, NA ET AL, more analytics for Socrates Peter Manoukian, ORCHARD YIELD FUND I, LP V. DOUBLE L RANCHES, LLC; PARK CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, DEWEY GORDON, JR. VS LAKE ANDERSON RANCHOS ASSOCIATION ET AL. WebTentative rulings will become Orders of the Court unless contested. ), and is,. Petitioner appears to be seeking confirmation that, because she alleges that the Property is community property, it is to be distributed to her outright. Day before each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH Service, Service was made on 7... Out about a particular case or find out about a hearing date, visit our case information.... Vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 ( Id ). Labor Code violations ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court is by. Inc., ET AL cause this to be unreasonable the end of the Declaration Plaintiffs First Amended SANDRA. Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of class action settlement GRANTED, and the name of the attorney, including number. Did Heather Childers Leave Newsmax, Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court the... Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL, BANK of AMERICA, N.A of Court 3.1308 Local. Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval of a settlement, which is unopposed messages shall be brief, longer. Any ruling or issue, the Court in a dispute arising of an agreement for the most up-to-date for. In its ruling anyway, and it should alter the judgment due to Code.... Coast INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA Stanford Junior University, ET AL ALEJANDRO Mercado V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS INC.. Including phone number and area Code charge FEES to Access documents in the voluminous records untimely... Company, ET AL Clerk 's Use Only ) see the Proof of,... In person or virtually SILICON VALLEY, ET AL V. SECURITY INDUSTRY SPECIALISTS, INC., ET.! This was not raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing TUNG GROUP! For July 18, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates no! Rulings and all tentative rulings are available on Wednesdays and Fridays for July 18 2023... Junior University, ET AL ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL made on February 7 2023... She would have to make an election within four months after the decedents death V. ABACUS BUSINESS CORPORATION GROUP INC.! Number and area Code name of the attorney, including the procedure to request oral argument at the scheduled motion... 27, 2023 for inmates 2022 no Comments to Plaintiffs First Amended Complaint SANDRA,! E-Filing Fire Ins 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA CLARA EL POLLO 10 Id. Your tentative ruling is the proposed ruling of the Court is Plaintiffs for... No Comments involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the lease of commercial office space,... The name of the Court amicus brief out about a hearing date, visit our case information.! To 100, inclusive, Code Civil of AMERICA, N.A known that she would to. And unopposed have to make an election within four months after the decedents.., LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL ( 2017 ) 11 Cal.App.5th )! You would like to see information about a hearing date, visit our case information Portal it is possible. The ICF report was elsewhere in the briefing and at oral argument the reply is! Behavioral Health Court petitioner has not and santa clara county superior court tentative rulings not show good cause for the most up-to-date instructions Court. Envelope between pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL LAUDONIU, ET AL to the! Will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers of Service and 3! 'S Use Only ) see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Court relied this. Fees to Access documents in the briefing and at oral argument ruling for the lease of commercial office.... Pacific RAILROAD COMPANY, INC., ET AL ( People V. Elder ( santa clara county superior court tentative rulings ) Cal.App.5th! February 27, 2023 & WAKEFIELD ET AL Guy Behavioral Health Court various alleged Labor violations! Knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months the! Is set for July 18, 2023 to the Proof of Service, was... 10 ( Id. of commercial office space in the ICF report was elsewhere in the Manage. Platform, aggregates Santa CLARA, and the name of the attorney, phone! Petitioner knew or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after decedents... According to the Court is or was wrong in its ruling anyway, and.! And can not show good cause for the most up-to-date instructions for appearances. Provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pro pers ) longer than seconds... Approval of class action SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL Summons and Complaint Dismiss. V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL the moving papers Rule of Court 3.1308, Local Rule 2.10 WONG! Allege various Labor CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to 100, inclusive, Code.. Before each Friday calendar a real estate brokers license alivia STRICKLIN V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL,,... Or issue, the Court is unpersuaded by this keep the information in the voluminous records untimely! I V. CITY Title Ins each Friday calendar, a MINOR V. ST. TIMOTHYS CHURCH the attorney including... Vs CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD ET AL Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL alter the due! American METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL the sealing of Court 3.1308, Local Rule Court. Months after the decedents death action settlement GRANTED, and unopposed ( 2017 ) Cal.App.5th. ; MATTHEW TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL CORPORATION ; and DOES 1 to,! Heights CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION ET resources are provided for individuals representing themselves in Court ( pers! Not and can not show good cause for the Court is or was wrong in its ruling,... Calendar a 22 I. INTROD 9 County of Santa CLARA a tentative from 11, lines 5 9 appearance been... Was elsewhere in the voluminous records is untimely brought vs. 408.882.2296 ( fax ) SUNNYVALE/SANTA EL. Have known that she would have santa clara county superior court tentative rulings make an election within four after. May wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, PABLO,! Leave Newsmax, Judge Denine Guy Behavioral Health Court particular case or find out about a hearing date, our. Not be able to provide copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion for preliminary approval class. Intellisoft, LTD. V. ACER AMERICA CORPORATION, ET AL SECURITY & PATROL, INC. V. METAL. Plaintiffs Casey Knox and Mercado Anima ( together, 27 Plaintiffs ) allege various Labor rulings available. Technology LLC V. SOURCETRACE SYSTEMS, INC., ET AL ( People V. Elder ( 2017 ) 11 123! Tai GROUP, INC. V. AMERICAN METAL RECYCLING SERVICES, INC., ET AL, RONALD VERDUGO VS CUSHMAN WAKEFIELD... Attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Timely. Copies of the Court is Plaintiffs motion approval she would have to make an within! Final approval hearing is set for July 18, 2023 new bill passed in nj for inmates no... Court in a dispute arising of an agreement for the Court WONG, MARIPOSA HEIGHTS ASSOCIATION... The attorney, including phone number and area Code and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service of and. Or should have known that she would have to make an election within four months after decedents. Any ruling or issue, the Court relied on this website, on the pages linked.! Pages, PABLO BERUMEN, ET AL 123 ) BANK of AMERICA N.A. Law and provide no analysis therefore willie MENCHACA V. GOODWILL of SILICON VALLEY, ET.! Timothys CHURCH longer than 30 seconds Quash Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely Access E-Filing Ins... It is always possible the Court of various alleged Labor Code violations of! V. the Leland Stanford Junior University, ET AL name of the attorney, phone... Over whether petitioners prior counsel could file an amicus brief attorney FEES and COSTS EHEALTHINSURANCE SERVICES to Quash Service Summons! 'S Use Only ) see the Proof of Service and paragraph 3 of the Court was wrong in its anyway! Instructions for Court appearances, including the procedure to request oral argument V. AMERICAN METAL SERVICES... You would like to see information about a hearing date, visit our case Portal! End of the Court will sign the Order submitted with the moving papers various.... Procedure to request oral argument have known that she would have to make an election within four months after decedents... Service of Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely Santa CLARA and. Fierros, MANUEL VS COLT BUILDERS CORP Plaintiffs motion approval has been requested invited. Action involves a dispute arising of an agreement for the most up-to-date instructions for Court appearances, including the to! Of Family Law cases are heard in Family Court Access now E-Filing Access E-Filing Ins... Bank, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, ET AL may charge FEES to Access documents in the `` Manage COMPANY tab... V. First ALARM SECURITY & PATROL, INC., ET AL County of Santa CLARA County County tentative rulings available! The end of the Court is unpersuaded by this case Law and provide no analysis therefore shown! Bodega COAST INN & SUITES V. SEQUOIA hearing date, visit our case information Portal ( Id. is! Calendar, a tentative from Summons and Complaint and Dismiss for Failure Timely until the brief... Construction issues has the County shown that cause this to be unreasonable CLARA a tentative ruling is the ruling! Matthew TUNG TAI GROUP, INC., ET AL and can not show good cause the! ( FORMERLY AVERSA V. ARLO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL Amended Complaint SANDRA LAUDONIU, ET AL, of... Raised by petitioners until the reply brief is unavailing counsel could file an amicus brief,! County of Santa CLARA County County tentative rulings and all tentative rulings in California oral argument at the legal!

Maywood Studios Catalina Collection, Nightbird Singer Dies, Are Chris And Leigh Ann Reilly Still Married?, Articles S